Orro? Since when does this happen?

So like, I was thinking. And I was thinking. And I was thinking. And then I thought. And finally it came to me. And I gathered the proof I needed to show it to be, what I feel, wrong. And here's what transpired.

Voided posts. That's what this is about. Usually, when a post is voided, the user gets to redo the post. Cases in point: Dante V Raigon. Spit V Dante. Ser V Tzura. Raigon V. V. etc..etc..etc..

So, if that is an already set precedence, then why was that not done? It's precedent that it is what's done. Now all of a sudden it's not when it suits us? o.o?

It just confuses me that people ignore precedence.

What are your thoughts people? o.o


I'm in no way trying to cause trouble. Instead, I'm just point out a discrepancy is all

Its not a rule. It depends on who voids out the post. If I void it, and say you can't repost. You can't. Its simple as that.

Actually its always been that way from my experience. When a post is voided, the topic continued on. Using the topics involving me for example. When my post was voided in the topic with with Spit trying to prevent my summon from dying, the topic continued and my summon died. Also with the topic with Raigon, i believe the voiding action was me interuppting a jutsu of his, therefore things kept going. Thats how I remember it and that's what I follow. I don't know about anyone else :/ Voided post are just that void and the order goes on. Now if Im wrong for believing this and following that precedence I thought was in place, then my bad is all I can say.

I remember it being that you got a repost. From when the topic was voided. Like, the topic was voide from X post to M post. So you get to contiunue from where X would have been.

That's what I saw. o.o

Like I said I'm not pointing names and saying fingers. I was just curious. o.o

I know. Im just letting you know that its not a rule, its just something that a Staff Member who is judging the topic gets to decide. Most of us naturally allow a redo, we don't think too much about it. Sometimes we also forget. It all just depends on what staff member is watching the fight. Until we have a rule that states that voids = redos, then its just dependent on the specific mods.

For me a void is a mistake on your part, a redo is more ooc...like using an ability you havent bought void

Someone denying your ability after it was approved and purchased, redo

Suno wrote:

For me a void is a mistake on your part, a redo is more ooc...like using an ability you havent bought void

Someone denying your ability after it was approved and purchased, redo

Its part of the game; if you fuck up in a post and its void you don't get a redo, you die. Simple as that, unless certain circumstances interfere like what Suno said above.